Why CIS Workouts Are Different Than Marketplace Options

Blog - Inside the Ride • CIS Training Systems • The Difference

Why CIS Workouts Are Different Than Marketplace Options

Workouts are everywhere. Results aren’t. CIS workouts are engineered to train execution—not just create fatigue.

Hook: Marketplace plans can build fitness. CIS builds fitness and the ability to apply it under fatigue—where races are decided.

We won’t publish proprietary prescriptions. But we will show the structure principles and the execution standards that make CIS workouts transfer to the real world.

The marketplace trap (why “good plans” still fail)

Most marketplace plans are built to be scalable: clean calendars, clear targets, broad applicability. That’s not “bad.” But it creates a predictable gap: athletes become very good at completing workouts without getting better at controlling performance.

And that’s why a rider can improve FTP, hit intervals, and still fade when the ride gets loud. The limiter wasn’t effort or fitness—it was execution behavior under fatigue: pacing discipline, cadence stability, gear timing, recovery integrity, and surge → settle control.

Simple truth

If your training doesn’t rehearse the moments that break you—fatigue, surges, short resets, and decision stress— it can still “work” and still fail to transfer.

The missing piece effect: most plans deliver workouts. CIS delivers workouts plus execution standards and coaching audit—so fitness transfers.

That missing piece is why athletes can “finish workouts” yet still fail late—because execution wasn’t trained, measured, or refined.

What the missing piece actually is

The missing piece isn’t another workout. It’s the mechanism that makes workouts transfer: execution standards + file truth + weekly refinement. Most athletes don’t fail because they lack effort. They fail because their training never forced them to hold control when fatigue and pressure show up.

1) Execution Standards

Rules that protect performance inside the session—so you don’t “win the workout” and lose the season. Standards keep sessions clean, repeatable, and race-relevant.

2) File Truth Audit

The file tells the truth: spikes, pacing drift, weak recoveries, late collapse, and “pretty” numbers that don’t transfer. CIS uses the file to identify what happened—not what you hoped happened.

3) Refinement Loop

The next prescription changes based on the truth from the last one. That’s why CIS results compound: every week becomes a targeted adjustment, not random repetition.

The missing piece effect (in one line)

Workouts build fitness. Execution + audit builds performance you can reproduce under pressure.

If your file looks like this, the plan isn’t enough

You can be “fit” and still be fragile. Here are the most common patterns we see when a plan produces completion but not control:

• Pacing spikes: you surge above target, then spend the rest of the interval surviving below it.
• Recoveries that aren’t recoveries: you never truly come down, so every rep gets noisier.
• Late-session collapse: round 3 looks nothing like round 1 (durability gap).
• Cadence/gear drift: fatigue forces grinding and torque panic instead of rhythm.
• “Pretty averages” with messy execution: the average looks fine, but the file is chaos.

CIS attacks these patterns directly—without needing more “hard.” It replaces chaos with standards.

The real difference

The biggest gap between marketplace workouts and CIS workouts isn’t “harder intervals.” It’s structure: the way a session is built to enforce control, reveal errors, and create repeatability. Most plans assume execution. CIS trains execution.

That means CIS workouts include constraints (how you must ride) and audit points (what the file must prove), not just a target number.

Why

Because race performance requires more than “completing intervals.” It requires decision control and repeatability under fatigue. If training doesn’t rehearse that, athletes get tired fit instead of race-ready.

How

CIS builds a control system inside the workout: rhythm, gear decisions, effort control, and true resets. Progression increases workload without losing standards.

What

Cleaner shelves, fewer random spikes, real recovery integrity, better late-ride output, and athletes who can surge → settle → repeat on demand.

Marketplace vs CIS (without the secret sauce)

Marketplace workouts usually optimize for:

• Broad applicability: one plan fits many people.
• Completion: “hit the numbers” is the pass/fail.
• Intensity as the lever: hard sessions become the identity.
• Minimal constraints: how you ride is mostly optional.
• Limited audit: the plan can’t correct execution habits.

CIS workouts are engineered to optimize for:

• Repeatability: quality that holds across rounds and weeks.
• Execution standards: control rules inside the session.
• Recovery integrity: true resets that protect the next effort.
• Transfer: skills that show up outside the trainer.
• File truth + refinement: each file becomes feedback for the next prescription.

How to evaluate any plan in 60 seconds

You don’t need a PhD to spot whether a plan will transfer. Ask these questions:

1. Does it train control? (pacing, cadence, gears, not just power targets)
2. Does it protect recovery? (real resets, not “keep pedaling because it feels tough”)
3. Does it measure repeatability? (round 3 matters as much as round 1)
4. Does it include durability? (late-ride standards, not just fresh-leg work)
5. Does it correct behavior? (some form of review, audit, or adaptation)

If the plan can’t answer most of these, it might still build fitness—but it’s less likely to build performance you can reproduce.

The CIS Difference (Practical)

• Skills inside physiology: rhythm, gearing decisions, and effort control are trained, not assumed.
• Repeatability first: progression is measured by how clean you can repeat—not how hard you can suffer once.
• Recovery integrity: resets are designed and enforced so quality remains high.
• Durability built in: late-ride standards matter, not just fresh-leg numbers.
• Audit points: the workout reveals execution errors so they can be fixed.

What “execution standards” mean

Execution standards are the rules that protect your performance: no spikes without purpose, true recovery resets, clean surge → settle control, and rhythm discipline when fatigue rises.

You don’t just “do the interval.” You prove you can control the interval.

The “file truth” difference (what CIS actually audits)

A marketplace plan can’t tell you whether you trained the right behavior. CIS can—because CIS looks for the patterns that decide races:

• Spikes vs shelves: are you producing controlled pressure or emotional noise?
• Reset integrity: can you truly come down and reapply?
• Repeatability: do later rounds resemble earlier rounds?
• Rhythm under load: do you stay organized when it gets uncomfortable?
• Decision behavior: do you surge → settle cleanly, or do you spiral?

Coach David-ism:

“A clean file is a trained skill.” CIS trains the skill—then uses the file to tighten it.

Hook → Story → Offer

Hook: Workouts are everywhere. Results are not.
Story: Generic plans can build fitness without training the execution behavior that decides races.
Offer: CIS delivers engineered sessions + execution standards + coaching review that converts every file into improvement.

The bottom line

If you want training that transfers to the real world, you need a system—not just a plan. CIS is built to make performance repeatable under pressure: Workouts + Coaching + Execution = Results.

Explore CIS Training Systems Enter The Workout Vault

© CIS Training Systems • Inside the Ride